Showing posts with label corporate social responsibility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corporate social responsibility. Show all posts

Tuesday, 6 November 2007

Developing the multi-cultural organisation: managing diversity or respecting differences?

Face the Challenge

Today's business and service organisations face a three-fold challenge. With management and employees of a variety of national and cultural backgrounds, they must:
1 enable this heterogeneous workforce to work together harmoniously toward their common goals;
2 maximise the contribution of each member of what is in fact a large team;
3 ensure fair treatment for all, irrespective of background.

Meeting this challenge demands systematic efforts on the part of these organisations, as many of them have come to realise. Whether the multi-cultural character of the company arises from its internationally mobile workforce and its local operations in various countries, or from the mixed backgrounds of a workforce in a single location, the organisation must address this diversity if it is to be successful.

DEFENSIVE OR DEVELOPMENTAL?
Every organisation has a strategic choice to make in how it will face this issue, between a fundamentally defensive approach, and one that is developmental in nature and effect.
An organisation which adopts the defensive approach treats cultural differences as hazards - a series of weak links between people in which there is great potential for misunderstanding, conflict, mistrust and even resentment. It assumes at the start that certain people are inherently culturally insensitive to others. Handling 'cultural diversity' therefore means avoiding giving offence to groups or individuals, preventing harassment, and managing grievances. It may have an implicit political objective as well, to reduce the alleged dominance of one 'culture' or another.
The developmental approach, on the other hand, first of all sees cultural differences for what they are - potentially different values, assumptions, expectations, and behaviour which people bring to business as a result of their differing backgrounds. As expressed by one prominent writer in the field, culture is "the way in which a group of people solves problems" (Trompenaars). Moreover, the developmental approach recognises that these collective tendencies reveal themselves as individual differences. Members of a team are not there to represent a 'culture' or particular ethnic group - they represent themselves.
A
CKNOWLEDGING THE DIFFERENCE
In this way, handling cultural differences means recognising
1 that these differences can have a significant impact on how people of different national or ethnic backgrounds approach the day-to-day issues of business and professional life, and
2 that people want those differences, where they exist, to be acknowledged. The developmental approach begins with the more positive assumption that while people may sometimes be unaware of these differences, they are not automatically insensitive to them.

The outcome of the developmental approach is a recognition of these different perspectives as alternative ways of handling particular situations. Cultural differences are no longer hazards - they are opportunities to strengthen the organisation through shared learning, better communication, and new perspectives.

How can one tell whether an organisation has adopted the defensive or the developmental approach? After all, any organisation can use terms such as 'diversity,' 'culture,' 'differences,' or even 'inclusiveness' to its general goals in this area, whatever the reality.

For a start, the defensive approach often arises as a reaction to grievances or conflicts. The organisation may define it through policies, procedures, and public relations statements, and make it visible through initiatives and 'programmes.' 'Training' is preoccupied with reducing insensitivity, often by trying to induce certain subjects to admit how insensitive they are. To the extent that such efforts are presented positively (or in the words of one company's website, "leverage[d] for competitive advantage"), it is as a question of equal employment opportunity.

THE RIGHT ROUTE
Farnham Castle helps its clients follow a developmental route, which assumes a very different form. It often starts at a local level, on a practical basis, with an individual's or a team's efforts to improve the way people work together, or to prepare for wider international responsibilities. It tends not to be fixed in policy or procedure, but instead is most often driven by business needs and actual situations faced by people. Training is interactive, involving exchanges of impressions, experiences, and problems amongst learners. It recognises that perceived differences are as important as 'real' ones, for it is our perceptions of others that give rise to our reactions and judgements.

People learning to handle cultural differences will learn a great deal when they become aware of how they are culturally viewed by others. In addition to awareness, informational briefings increase people's knowledge of possible differences between cultures. That insight in turn helps them see how apparently 'strange' behaviour has its own cultural 'logic,' as the way in which a group of people have, as we said, solved universal problems. With increased mutual awareness and knowledge, mistrust tends to evaporate and questions of cultural 'dominance' become irrelevant.

PRACTICAL BENEFITS
The practical benefits of the developmental approach are seen in their effects on management style and on the way a team works together. 'Cultural' differences are now seen as individual differences arising out of people's backgrounds. These various points of view, openly communicated, represent alternatives and choices available to the group for consideration and negotiation. A greater willingness to talk directly about differences helps build trust, facilitates decision-making and opens the way, where appropriate, to compromise.

The developmental approach, as we have labelled it, needs sound leadership if it is to take root. It will be nourished by the resources of an organisation such as Farnham Castle, which is able to offer (1) collaborative training to raise awareness and increase knowledge, (2) extensive expertise in various business cultures and in the challenges and goals of international business. The developmental approach is further enhanced by training that strengthens the skills required to handle difficult situations and to communicate effectively in intercultural settings.

DIVERSITY TRULY VALUED
None of this, of course, is to imply that organisations should not concern themselves with the indispensable goals of providing a working environment that is free of 'harassment' and discrimination, and of ensuring equal career opportunities for all. We would simply say, however, that truly 'valuing diversity' means valuing the contributions that 'diverse' individuals can make. A developmental, rather than a purely defensive, approach to dealing with cultural differences will help make that a reality.

Article by Robert Day, a senior consultant for Farnham Castle specialising in effective communication/negotiation, team development, and cross-cultural issues in international business

Tuesday, 30 October 2007

South Asia - Introduction to Business Culture and Protocol



South Asia contains about a quarter of the world's population and any way you cut the demographics it is a large, growing and important market, with the new knowledge- based industries - such as software - up there amongst the world's best. And it is by no means a difficult market for us. Look at what we have going for us. English is the language of business; our laws and legal systems are substantially the same. Indeed the way we go about our daily work is very similar and you will find both women and men in senior positions in both industry and politics. We have a common heritage in much that we do and love - including cricket!

So how do you prepare for a first visit to this vast subcontinent? Well - and much of this is self-evident- the first thing to do is to satisfy yourself that there is a market for your product or service. South Asia is amongst the most price competitive markets in the world, so try to do some research on competitive local pricing before you go - or put it high on the list of things to do in your visit. There is help at hand in doing this pre-visit research including Trade Partners UK where a variety of subsidised services are available to help you- for instance market information reports which amongst other things assess the market for your product or service, review competition and profile potential agents, distributors, partners and so on together with names of professional advisers you might want to consult. Do some homework on the area too. Give some thought to your market entry strategy. Is it to find an agent or distributor? A joint venture partner or what?

Think carefully about your itinerary. Try to be sure you are meeting decision makers - not always as easy at it sounds. Check whether there are any national or local holidays during your trip and be sure to leave enough time between meetings to get from one to another. Crossing some of the big cities can take literally hours. Taxis are safe but can and do get lost! Better to ask for a hotel car.

What clothes to pack? For business meetings you won't go wrong with a suit in the winter months and a short sleeved shirt and tie in the very hot summer months. Speak to a local travel clinic and seek advice on the appropriate vaccinations. Get a visa. Take a few small gifts with you. Corporate "giveaways" for use at the end of business meetings and a few pieces of china, or the like, as gifts if you are invited in to your host's home.

Know your product or service inside out and those of your world-wide competitors' too. The local businessmen are well travelled and will almost certainly know your competitors - particularly their prices. Take plenty of company and product literature with you and a good supply of business cards.

In doing business you are likely to meet with any or all of the following management styles:
• The business house and which is something of a hang over from the past when family driven conglomerates thrived behind the wall of import protection and on cosy political friendships. They tend to be autocratic and, to us, seem disorganised.
• The subsidiary or associate of a MNC with local publicly quoted shareholdings which was a means of complying with the (then) rules limiting foreign ownership. They are professionally managed with a good understanding of marketing and strong local brands.
• The service companies which are typified by the young, successful, often US focused, software companies. World class in both their output and corporate governance and many say are the bow wave of India emerging as a superpower in the world's knowledge based industries.
• The public sector is still very much a dominant and often a monopoly force throughout South Asia. It tends to be inefficient; bureaucratic, over manned and heavily unionised.

What can you expect at your first meeting? Don't be surprised or put off by what you have seen on your way to the meeting nor the building or offices you have arrived at. Remember all is not always what it seems. Time keeping and time management are not always what we would want. And your meeting may suffer a number of interruptions. You will be greeted with hospitality and drink lots of tea before you leave. Be ready for an opening conversation on anything but business and let your host lead it towards business. Remember you are hopefully starting to build a relationship - which is important to the local businessman. At the end of the meeting sum up, check there is a common understanding and seek agreement to what you have discussed and decided. Then send written confirmation when you return to your home office. Local businessmen love "MOU's" - memorandum of understanding.

During your meeting seek to find out who is the real decision-maker. Don't be surprised if after a while you are invited to meet the head of the family. He or she may very well be the real decision-maker and the one who approves the deal. Don't be surprised too if he or she tries to shave prices further as part of the approval. Do not be disappointed if your first meeting fails to reach the decisions you had hoped for. Patience is a virtue and nowhere is this more true or necessary than in South Asia. The decision making process can take several meetings and involve several people. And often bureaucracy rears its head to delay and occasionally prevent decisions.

Age and "keeping face" are important factors to remember. Age demands respect and in many companies is part of the hierarchy. Forms of address vary widely from "Sir" or "Madam" through to first names from the very first meeting. Some of the older companies have a formal style and others, particularly the newer ones, are both informal in their style and dress codes. You just have to feel your way on this. The fear of losing face restricts some people from contributing to a discussion. Drawing out comment from people can sometimes be tough but it is worth working at. The good and much used words "No problem" usually means quite the opposite, and is a warning to probe politely!

Meetings, particularly the more serious ones may often conclude or extend into an invitation to a lunch or dinner and which as the relationship develops may well be to meet the family at home.
When you return to your home office document and send your understanding, decisions and next steps to the companies you have met. Remember that whilst they may have thought you were the proverbial answer to the maiden's prayers whilst you were with them, out of sight is also out of mind. So you will almost certainly have to chase the promised actions. Be patient and don't be surprised by surprises!

Farnham Castle/Julian Stretch

Julian Stretch OBE is a trade and investment adviser to a number of companies including the South Asia unit of the UK's Department of Trade & Industry. From 1995 to 1999 he was Director of International Operations for a British domestic appliance manufacturer. Prior to that he spent 25 years with Rank Xerox Ltd including managing the company's operations in South Asia, Eastern Europe, Russia and the Middle East. He established Rank Xerox in India where he set up a manufacturing and marketing joint venture. From 1988 to 1992 he was chairman of the then British Overseas Trade Board's area advisory group for South Asia. He was awarded the OBE for services to exports in 1992.

Friday, 12 October 2007

We are all responsible

Organisations of the 21st century can no longer limit themselves to producing and marketing products or services without any concerns for the impact they have on society. Philippe Nitzer, a senior intercultural specialist at Farnham Castle, examines one aspect of the increasing role of the corporate body in society at large

Shareholder and investment groups are now looking to companies to be accountable for fair and equitable working environments for staff. The published lists of 'best places to work' can be a determining factor in investment decisions since studies show a positive correlation between socially responsible workplace programmes and positive financial results.

Employees also recognise that they can have a role promoting change in the workplace. An increasing number of employers are responding to affinity groups covering a wide range of employee interests.

If they want to be trusted by their customers, employees and the public at large, companies are realising they have to be more socially responsible. With the rapid growth of multiculturalism in Britain, a key issue of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) which needs to be addressed is the effective integration of ethnic minorities in the workplace and the community. The publicity surrounding the increasing numbers of overseas nurses arriving in Britain to work in the NHS is a good example.

Demographic changes
The demographic changes of the 50s and 70s have left many British companies struggling to deal with the problem themselves. Many organisations have played a passive role in this integration process by staying just within the legal boundaries and are now experiencing difficulties in that area.

A lack of consideration of differences
One of the major reasons behind these integration problems is the lack of awareness and consideration for cultural differences. People from different cultural backgrounds have different sets of norms, different sets of values and different assumptions. This means that we all have different ways of reacting to events, different ways of communicating and different behaviours. We judge others from our own frame of reference and tend to think that 'our way is the right way'.

In a multicultural workforce, this can lead to misinterpretation, misunderstanding, incomprehension, mistrust and disrespect. As a result, rather than getting closer, people distance themselves from those they consider different, groups are formed on the basis of commonalities, whether it is ethnicity, colour, language etc and 'departmental ghettos' start to appear. Often, there are rivalries and tensions. In some instances, these situations can degenerate into discrimination, bullying or racist behaviours.

The law is not enough
Staying within the letter of the law is not enough for organisations experiencing these situations. It is imperative for them to resolve these issues if they want to retain a stable and productive workforce and be regarded as good 'corporate citizens'. Organisations can be more socially responsible by contributing to a smooth cultural integration of ethnic minorities into the workforce.

Being more socially responsible
Integration does not mean imposing one way. It means harmonising and synergizing differences. Having a clear and unbiased understanding of the context is the first step toward formulating proper integration strategies.

The second step is to develop cultural awareness. Being open to differences, understanding and respecting the other's cultural background are the key elements in preparing the ground for integration.

The third step is to build or rebuild trust.

Finally, only when trust has been demonstrated from all sides, can solutions be discussed. It is this step where different norms and values are reconciled and tangible and intangible elements of integration are defined. Building shared ownership of the solutions is at that stage essential to reinforce trust and guarantee implementation.

These steps can take different forms; for example, interviews with the various groups involved for step one, training programmes at the levels concerned in the organisation for step two and facilitated workshops for steps three and four, involving all concerned or a limited number of influential representatives of each group, who can then intervene as mentors to their members.
Being proactive in the integration process of ethnic minorities is a corporate social duty which can strongly impact on the community and contribute to a much more committed workforce.
During the last few months, Farnham Castle has been working with a number of clients in the development of programmes, using a training approach normally associated with supporting the integration of home and foreign workforces, to address the growing issue of multicultural tension within the domestic workforce. Because of the sensitivity of the issue, each programme has to be very carefully designed and often involves a number of programmes, each with a different perspective at each level.

The need to exercise corporate social responsibility is evolving in many different guises. In light of The Department of Trade and Industry's recently issued consultation paper entitled 'Towards Equality and Diversity', pre-empting proposed legislative amendments to comply with EU legislation, perhaps this one in particular needs our attention now.

http://www.intercultural-training.co.uk/

Tuesday, 9 October 2007

Going on an international assignment? - What about the family's needs?

The opportunity of an overseas assignment can be an enriching experience enabling personal as well as professional development. This of course necessitates change which will inevitably present some challenges as well as opportunities. Adequate preparation for change is essential to ensure a smooth transition and also requires good communication.

Open and honest communication is necessary right from the beginning. From the skills used in informing the employee of the international opportunity through to how it is discussed with the partner. Just as important also is how children and extended family receive the news. Without good communication there will not be the necessary support to enable greater adaptability and less vulnerability to stress.

Changes will take place within the interpersonal relationships of the couple and the family. Living away from easy access to familiar sources of support, individuals often become more dependent on each other. There is the opportunity to get to know each other in a different way and the possibility to grow and develop a special bond together. This is dependent on open communication which means firstly negotiating and making time for each other. Healthy communication has to be a two-way process of expressing emotions and feeling heard and accepted.

Solutions may not always be necessary. Making time for each other to share feelings and patient understanding may be all that is required.

Children need communication as well. They need to be prepared and to be told what is happening and as early as possible. This includes children as young as two years as they are at the life-stage of beginning to develop attachments and need security. They have to be able to say goodbye to friends and family left behind and to be reassured that they will see each other again. It is also very important at this time of change to maintain a routine of familiarity.
Communicating with children needs to be as concrete as possible, telling them the reason according to their developmental age why the family are moving and where they are moving to. Reassurance and honest replies to questions, as well as making time for cuddles, hugs and being close, all play a part. Children should be encouraged to express their feelings and space and time provided for children to talk and to be listened to when they do.

With older children there is also a need to be aware of each others feelings and to encourage expression of feelings as well as sharing in and giving each other support. Adjustment takes time. This is normal. With patience, understanding and good communication the family will have grown together and shared in a very special experience.

Cultural adaptation, living conditions including children's health, welfare and education and the opportunity to discuss family experiences first-hand can be included within the highly successful customised family briefings at Farnham Castle and make a valuable input into this important transitional period.

Monday, 17 September 2007

Globalisation is here to stay

The argument for increased intercultural understanding has never been greater
The level of globalisation seen in the last 20 years is not going to go away. Companies need to operate worldwide businesses, and they will continue to do so. Because so many multinational companies receive substantial revenues outside their home country, they cannot withdraw their current management, operations and resources without huge consequences. Substantial planning and structural changes are necessary before such decisions can be made.

In the short term, some companies might retrench and repatriate their people early. But with the current economic downturn, there may be no job opportunities back home! Other companies may choose to move their people out of 'risky' areas and relocate them to perceptibly 'safer havens'.

Twenty years ago employees were expatriated primarily to export their knowledge and skills to other countries. In today's environment, fewer expatriates are needed because companies have built up capabilities in production, marketing, technology, and management, to serve a global network which no longer has a specific home location.

As a result, the number of expatriates represents the core number of employees needed to support globalisation on a worldwide basis. Terrorist threats will not change the need for the development, exchange, and placement of key personnel globally.

The argument for increased intercultural understanding has never been greater. Working successfully in/or managing multicultural teams is a growing focus, along with long-distance management and effective communication strategies.

It is generally accepted that in Europe there is more respect for the time it takes to achieve the desired outcomes of business management programmes. In addition, there is a desire for a more thorough, in-depth exploration of issues and strategies.

A fragile, unhappy, fearful expat family may simply be pushed over the edge by all that they have witnessed. Catching these families early is a challenge to avoid the difficult consequences of an early repatriation.

Family issues will become more important as companies face increasing difficulty in filling overseas assignments with fewer willing to go. Now more than ever, family support will become paramount and forward-thinking companies will recognise this and provide the necessary emotional and factual preparation.

Mobility will not stop. People have to feel secure and their companies need to provide that protection, emotionally and physically. Without it, there can be no global workforce.

Monday, 10 September 2007

Facing the Challenge of Cultural Diversity

Face the Challenge

Developing the multi-cultural organisation: managing diversity or respecting differences?
Today's business and service organisations face a three-fold challenge. With management and employees of a variety of national and cultural backgrounds, they must:


1 enable this heterogeneous workforce to work together harmoniously toward their common goals;
2 maximise the contribution of each member of what is in fact a large team;
3 ensure fair treatment for all, irrespective of background.


Meeting this challenge demands systematic efforts on the part of these organisations, as many of them have come to realise. Whether the multi-cultural character of the company arises from its internationally mobile workforce and its local operations in various countries, or from the mixed backgrounds of a workforce in a single location, the organisation must address this diversity if it is to be successful.


DEFENSIVE OR DEVELOPMENTAL?


Every organisation has a strategic choice to make in how it will face this issue, between a fundamentally defensive approach, and one that is developmental in nature and effect.
An organisation which adopts the defensive approach treats cultural differences as hazards - a series of weak links between people in which there is great potential for misunderstanding, conflict, mistrust and even resentment. It assumes at the start that certain people are inherently culturally insensitive to others. Handling 'cultural diversity' therefore means avoiding giving offence to groups or individuals, preventing harassment, and managing grievances. It may have an implicit political objective as well, to reduce the alleged dominance of one 'culture' or another.
The developmental approach, on the other hand, first of all sees cultural differences for what they are - potentially different values, assumptions, expectations, and behaviour which people bring to business as a result of their differing backgrounds. As expressed by one prominent writer in the field, culture is "the way in which a group of people solves problems" (Trompenaars). Moreover, the developmental approach recognises that these collective tendencies reveal themselves as individual differences. Members of a team are not there to represent a 'culture' or particular ethnic group - they represent themselves.


ACKNOWLEDGING THE DIFFERENCE


In this way, handling cultural differences means recognising
1 that these differences can have a significant impact on how people of different national or ethnic backgrounds approach the day-to-day issues of business and professional life, and
2 that people want those differences, where they exist, to be acknowledged. The developmental approach begins with the more positive assumption that while people may sometimes be unaware of these differences, they are not automatically insensitive to them.


The outcome of the developmental approach is a recognition of these different perspectives as alternative ways of handling particular situations. Cultural differences are no longer hazards - they are opportunities to strengthen the organisation through shared learning, better communication, and new perspectives.


How can one tell whether an organisation has adopted the defensive or the developmental approach? After all, any organisation can use terms such as 'diversity,' 'culture,' 'differences,' or even 'inclusiveness' to its general goals in this area, whatever the reality.


For a start, the defensive approach often arises as a reaction to grievances or conflicts. The organisation may define it through policies, procedures, and public relations statements, and make it visible through initiatives and 'programmes.' 'Training' is preoccupied with reducing insensitivity, often by trying to induce certain subjects to admit how insensitive they are. To the extent that such efforts are presented positively (or in the words of one company's website, "leverage[d] for competitive advantage"), it is as a question of equal employment opportunity.


THE RIGHT ROUTE


Farnham Castle helps its clients follow a developmental route, which assumes a very different form. It often starts at a local level, on a practical basis, with an individual's or a team's efforts to improve the way people work together, or to prepare for wider international responsibilities. It tends not to be fixed in policy or procedure, but instead is most often driven by business needs and actual situations faced by people. Training is interactive, involving exchanges of impressions, experiences, and problems amongst learners. It recognises that perceived differences are as important as 'real' ones, for it is our perceptions of others that give rise to our reactions and judgements.


People learning to handle cultural differences will learn a great deal when they become aware of how they are culturally viewed by others. In addition to awareness, informational briefings increase people's knowledge of possible differences between cultures. That insight in turn helps them see how apparently 'strange' behaviour has its own cultural 'logic,' as the way in which a group of people have, as we said, solved universal problems. With increased mutual awareness and knowledge, mistrust tends to evaporate and questions of cultural 'dominance' become irrelevant.


PRACTICAL BENEFITS


The practical benefits of the developmental approach are seen in their effects on management style and on the way a team works together. 'Cultural' differences are now seen as individual differences arising out of people's backgrounds. These various points of view, openly communicated, represent alternatives and choices available to the group for consideration and negotiation. A greater willingness to talk directly about differences helps build trust, facilitates decision-making and opens the way, where appropriate, to compromise.


The developmental approach, as we have labelled it, needs sound leadership if it is to take root. It will be nourished by the resources of an organisation such as Farnham Castle, which is able to offer (1) collaborative training to raise awareness and increase knowledge, (2) extensive expertise in various business cultures and in the challenges and goals of international business. The developmental approach is further enhanced by training that strengthens the skills required to handle difficult situations and to communicate effectively in intercultural settings.


DIVERSITY TRULY VALUED


None of this, of course, is to imply that organisations should not concern themselves with the indispensable goals of providing a working environment that is free of 'harassment' and discrimination, and of ensuring equal career opportunities for all. We would simply say, however, that truly 'valuing diversity' means valuing the contributions that 'diverse' individuals can make. A developmental, rather than a purely defensive, approach to dealing with cultural differences will help make that a reality.


Article by Robert Day, a senior consultant for Farnham Castle specialising in effective communication/negotiation, team development, and cross-cultural issues in international business.

http://www.intercultural-training.co.uk/

Tuesday, 4 September 2007

Corporate Social Resposibility

Corporate Social Responsibility
New Fad or Necessity


Organisations of the 21st century can no longer limit themselves to producing and marketing products or services without any concerns for the impact they have on society. If they want to be trusted by their customers, employees and the public at large, they have to be more socially responsible. One key issue of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) which needs to be addressed is the integration of ethnic minorities in the workplace and the community.

Demographic changes
The lack of proper governmental strategies following the demographic changes of the 50's and 70's, has left many British companies struggling to this day to deal with the problem themselves. Many organisations have played a passive role in this integration process by staying within the legal boundaries and are now experiencing difficulties in that area.

A lack of consideration of differences
One of the major reasons behind these integration problems is the lack of awareness and consideration for cultural differences. People from different cultural backgrounds have different sets of norms, different sets of values and different assumptions. This means that we all have different ways of reacting to events, different ways of communicating and different behaviours. We judge the others from our own frame of reference and tend to think that "our way is the right way".

In a multicultural workforce, this can lead to misinterpretation, misunderstanding, incomprehension, mistrust and disrespect. As a result, rather than getting closer, people distance themselves from those they consider different and groups are formed on the basis of commonalities, whether it is ethnicity, colour, language etc. "Departmental ghettos" start to appear. Often, there are rivalries and tensions. In some instances, these situations can degenerate into discrimination, bullying or racist behaviours.

The law is not enough
Staying within the letter of the law is not enough for organisations experiencing these situations. It is imperative for them to resolve these issues if they want to retain a stable and productive workforce and be regarded as good "corporate citizens". Organisation can be more socially responsible by contributing to a smooth cultural integration of ethnic minorities into the workplace.

Being more socially responsible
Integration does not mean imposing one way. It means harmonising and synergizing differences. Having a clear and unbiased understanding of the context is the first step toward formulating proper integration strategies. The second step is to develop cultural awareness. Being open to differences, understanding and respecting the other's cultural background are the key elements in preparing the ground for integration. The third step is to build or rebuild trust. Finally, only when trust has been demonstrated from all sides, solutions can be discussed. It is the step where different norms and values are reconciled and tangible and intangible elements of integration are defined. Building shared ownership of the solutions is at that stage essential to reinforce trust and guarantee implementation.

These steps can take different forms; for example interviews with the various groups involved for step one, training programmes at the levels concerned in the organisation for step two and facilitated workshops for steps three and four involving all concerned or a limited number of influential representatives of each group, who can then intervene as mentors to their members.

Being proactive in the integration process of ethnic minorities is a corporate social duty which can strongly impact the community and contribute to a much more committed workforce.

During the last few months Farnham has been working with a number of clients in the development of programmes, using a training approach normally associated with supporting the integration of home and foreign workforces, to address the growing issue of multicultural tension within the domestic workforce. Because of the sensitivity of the issue, each programme has to be very carefully designed and often involves a number of programmes each with a different perspective at each level. The need to exercise corporate social responsibility is evolving in many different guises, in light of recent events, perhaps this one in particular needs our attention now.

To find out more about how Farnham Castle can help you, please email: info@farnhamcastle.com, or visit our website at http://www.intercultural-training.co.uk



Add to Technorati Favorites

Farnham Castle

Farnham Castle
Farnham Castle